Chapter 4

Economy: from the periphery to the top twenty

Since 1992 Poland grew without interruption for longer than any other European country. It is now the world's 21st-largest economy, a whisker from the top twenty, and the fastest-growing large economy in the EU.

This chapter collects the hard numbers on the size and speed of the Polish economy: nominal GDP passed one trillion dollars in 2025, real output is up 114% since EU accession, and income per head in purchasing-power terms has climbed from half to four-fifths of the EU average. It also shows two cracks visible in the very same databases: the second-highest deficit in the EU and an investment rate below the average.

Fig. 4.1

A resilient economy: Poland's GDP growth against the EU

Real GDP growth, % year on year, 2015–2025; Poland 2026–2027: European Commission forecast (spring 2026)

A resilient economy: Poland's GDP growth against the EUpandemic−8%−6%−4%−2%0%2%4%6%8%2015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027forecast →Poland 2.8%Czechia 2.6%European Union 1.5%Germany 0.2%2020: −2.0% — the shallowest fall inthe EU (average −5.6%)PolandEuropean UnionGermanyCzechia
  • 28 years of uninterrupted growth (1992–2019) — the longest run in Europe
  • 2009: the only EU country without a recession (+2.6%); 2020: the shallowest pandemic recession in the EU (−2.0%)
  • 2025: +3.6% against +1.5% in the EU and +0.2% in Germany

Poland's economy is neither the largest in the region nor the richest — it is the most resilient. Between 1992 and 2019 it grew without a single year of contraction, and in 2009, when the whole Union shrank by more than 4%, it was the only member state to grow. The pandemic broke that run more gently than anywhere else in the EU: −2.0% against an average of −5.6% and −10.9% in Spain.

After the inflation-driven slowdown of 2023, growth returned to 3–4% a year — two to three times the euro-area pace. Forecasts by the Commission, the central bank and the rating agencies converge on 3.5–3.7% for 2026 and about 2.8% for 2027, as the biggest investment impulse of recent years — the EU Recovery and Resilience plan — winds down.

Fig. 4.2

The race since 2004: who grew the most since the EU's enlargement

Cumulative real GDP growth 2004→2025, % (2004 = 100); compounded from World Bank annual growth rates

The race since 2004: who grew the most since the EU's enlargementIreland188.0%Poland114.5%Lithuania91.0%Slovakia87.7%Romania85.4%Bulgaria79.7%Czechia57.3%Hungary45.8%Spain32.5%European Union31.8%Germany25.2%Portugal23.1%Greece−3.9%
  • Poland: +114.5% real GDP 2004–2025 — 3.6 times the EU average
  • Germany over the same period: +25.2%; Greece: −3.9%

One chart that sums up two decades. Since the Union's 2004 enlargement the Polish economy has more than doubled, while the EU as a whole grew by less than a third and Germany — the main market for Polish exports — by a quarter. Only Ireland is ahead, and Ireland's GDP is a statistical artefact of corporate accounting.

Over the same period Greece shrank, and Portugal — the country Poland caught up with in income per head in 2025 — grew by less than a quarter. Among the Union's large economies, nobody closed the gap faster.

Fig. 4.3

From one half to four-fifths: GDP per head relative to the EU average

GDP per capita in purchasing power standards (PPS), EU27 = 100, 1995–2025

From one half to four-fifths: GDP per head relative to the EU average0%20%40%60%80%100%19951998200120042007201020132016201920222025Poland 81.4%2004 — EU accession: 51.6%2020: 78.4%
  • 1995: 43.7% of the EU average · 2004: 51.6% · 2014: 68.0% · 2025: 81.4%
  • 2025: Poland drew level with Portugal and overtook Greece, Hungary, Slovakia and Estonia

The strongest single number of this chapter: at the moment of accession the average resident of Poland produced just over half of what the average EU resident did; in 2025 — more than four-fifths. That is 30 percentage points in one generation, with a clear acceleration after 2004 and during the pandemic years, when the rest of Europe braked harder than Poland.

Drawing level with Portugal, a member since 1986, is a symbolic reference point in the Polish debate about “catching up with the West”. The years 2001–2003 show that convergence is not automatic: before accession the indicator stood still for three years.

Fig. 4.4

Level with Portugal: GDP per head across the EU, 2025

GDP per capita in PPS, EU27 = 100, 2025

Level with Portugal: GDP per head across the EU, 2025Luxembourg239.2Ireland224.6Netherlands132.7Denmark129.8Austria117.9Germany115.4Belgium114.5Sweden111.6Malta109.7Finland101.2Cyprus98.5France98.0Italy96.1Czechia92.8Spain91.7Slovenia90.7Lithuania87.0Portugal81.4Poland81.4Estonia79.6Croatia77.9Romania77.8Hungary76.3Slovakia74.9Latvia70.9Greece68.4Bulgaria68.2EU27 = 100
  • Poland 81.4 — above Estonia, Croatia, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Latvia, Greece and Bulgaria
  • Czechia (92.8) and Spain (91.7) are still about 10 points away

The 2025 ranking shows where Poland stands right now: mid-table, exactly level with Portugal and ahead of every country that joined the Union with it or later — except Czechia, Slovenia and Lithuania. Back in 2004 Poland was second to last among the then 25 members, ahead only of Latvia.

The distance to the “old Union” has not vanished: Spain and Czechia are ten points away, Germany thirty-four. But the direction and the pace are unambiguous, and in the purchasing power of minimum wages and median incomes (chapter 5) convergence is even further advanced.

Fig. 4.5

From double-digit unemployment to one of the lowest rates in Europe

Unemployment rate (LFS, ages 15–74), % of the labour force, annual averages 2009–2025

From double-digit unemployment to one of the lowest rates in Europe0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%200920112013201520172019202120232025EU27 6%Poland 3.1%2013: 10.6% — the post-crisis peakPolandEU27
  • 2013: 10.6% · 2025: 3.1% — against an EU average of 6.0%
  • June 2026: 3.1% — third-lowest in the EU (after Bulgaria and Cyprus, 3.0% each)

A decade ago Poland had higher unemployment than Spain has today. The lines crossed around 2014 and since then the Polish labour market has been among the tightest in the Union: for the past five years the rate has not exceeded 3.5%, and in 2023 it fell to 2.8%.

Precision matters: in individual months Poland is sometimes first, but in June 2026 it was third — after Bulgaria and Cyprus. The flip side of this success is a shortage of workers, filled to a large extent by people from Ukraine and Belarus (chapter 15).

Fig. 4.6

The dark side of the boom: the second-highest deficit in the Union

General government balance, % of GDP, 2025 (EDP notification, April 2026)

The dark side of the boom: the second-highest deficit in the UnionRomania−7.9%Poland−7.3%Belgium−5.2%France−5.1%Hungary−4.7%Slovakia−4.5%Austria−4.2%Bulgaria−3.5%Finland−3.4%EU27−3.1%Italy−3.1%Croatia−3.0%Germany−2.7%Slovenia−2.5%Spain−2.4%Czechia−2.1%Netherlands−1.6%Sweden−1.3%Portugal0.7%Greece1.7%Ireland1.8%Denmark2.9%Cyprus3.4%
  • Deficit 2025: −7.3% of GDP (EU: −3.1%); Commission forecast: −6.5% in 2026, −6.3% in 2027
  • Debt: 59.7% of GDP (EU: 81.7%) — still low, but the fastest-rising in the EU: 64.5% in 2026, 68.3% in 2027
  • Fitch and Moody's: negative outlook (2025), ratings A−/A2 affirmed

Record growth is to a large extent financed by a record deficit — defence spending and social transfers, part of them booked outside the budget. In 2025 only Romania had a bigger hole in its public finances; Poland's deficit was more than twice the EU average.

It is a number with two faces. Public debt (59.7% of GDP) remains 22 points below the EU average and under the Maastricht threshold, but it is rising faster than anywhere else in the Union, and three of the four rating agencies have moved their outlook to negative. No rating has been cut — a warning, not a downgrade.

Fig. 4.7

Growing, but investing less: the investment gap with the EU

Gross fixed capital formation, % of GDP, 2015–2025

Growing, but investing less: the investment gap with the EU16%17%18%19%20%21%22%23%20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025EU27 21.5%Poland 17.1%PolandEU27
  • 2015: Poland 20.2% of GDP vs EU 20.0% · 2025: Poland 17.1% vs EU 21.5%
  • A 4.4-point gap despite the largest inflow of EU funds in history
  • Recovery plan: EUR 54.7 bn, EUR 34.2 bn (62%) disbursed by June 2026; the facility closes on 31 December 2026

The second crack in the success story. In 2015 Poland invested slightly more than the average EU country; ten years later — clearly less. Growth is driven by household consumption and public spending, not private capital, and the investment rate has been persistently below the EU average since 2016.

The EU recovery plan partly masks the problem: it is the largest external investment impulse in the history of the Polish economy, and it is winding down — the last payments fall at the end of 2026. Hence the growth slowdown forecast for 2027.

Fig. 4.8

From deflation through the 2022 shock to the central bank's target: inflation 2015–2025

Harmonised index of consumer prices (HICP), annual average rate of change, %, 2015–2025

From deflation through the 2022 shock to the central bank's target: inflation 2015–2025−2.5%0%2.5%5%7.5%10%12.5%15%20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025−0.7%−0.2%1.6%1.2%2.1%3.7%5.2%13.2%10.9%3.7%3.3%Poland 3.3%2022: 13.2% — the peak of the energyshock
  • Peak: 13.2% in 2022 — the highest this century; 2025: 3.3%; July 2026: 3.0% (CPI)
  • NBP reference rate: 0.10% (2020) → 6.75% (Sept 2022) → 3.75% (since March 2026)

A sequence in three acts: the deflation of 2015–2016, the energy shock after Russia's invasion of Ukraine that pushed prices up 13% in a single year, and the return to the vicinity of the central bank's target. The National Bank of Poland raised rates by 665 basis points in eleven months — one of the fastest normalisations in Europe — and has cut them seven times since May 2025.

For this story inflation is context, not protagonist: without this series every chart of nominal wages in chapter 5 would mislead.